| Author |  | 
      
        | Gekonauak IRC
 
  
 
 Joined: 10 May 2006
 Posts: 1595
 | 
          There are a few.
           | Posted: 27 January 2011 at 11:06am | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 e.g. R/O1 Time Skip reacts to anything.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Tarquon Exalted
 
  
 
 Joined: 02 January 2007
 Posts: 197
 | 
          What gives the time skip this special ability?
           | Posted: 27 January 2011 at 11:21am | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 you could react to a card function that gives an extra card draw,
 but then you would have to rule on what happens to the cards
 that were already drawn and placed into the hand (out of play).
 icky.
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Gekonauak IRC
 
  
 
 Joined: 10 May 2006
 Posts: 1595
 | 
          The Time Skip can react to a card draw.
           | Posted: 27 January 2011 at 11:30am | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 Which is why the Time Skip should never have been created.
 
 Too many unanswered questions.
 
 Knowing how the company created cards, it is possible that this card was never even play tested.
 
 But, to answer the question as to what happens...
 
 If the Time Skip was played on the Cessation of Time, you would draw cards as normal. When the Time Skip expired and the Cessation of Time came back into play, no longer having a viable target, it would be discarded.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Tarquon Exalted
 
  
 
 Joined: 02 January 2007
 Posts: 197
 | 
          But there's rarely anything to react to in the draw cards phase that would allow the Cessation of Time to be played in the first place.
           | Posted: 27 January 2011 at 11:41am | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Gekonauak IRC
 
  
 
 Joined: 10 May 2006
 Posts: 1595
 | 
          The act of drawing crds can be reacted to.
           | Posted: 31 January 2011 at 1:01pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Tarquon Exalted
 
  
 
 Joined: 02 January 2007
 Posts: 197
 | 
          Not unless the draw is due to a card function.
           | Posted: 31 January 2011 at 1:59pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  (according to the universe 2.0 rules)
 
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Lobo IRC
 
  
 
 Joined: 04 July 2007
 Location: United States
 Posts: 533
 | 
          ""The following things can be 
reacted to: Point allocation, a card being played, a card action, weapons fire, 
and the discarding of cards during the Discard Phase.""
           | Posted: 31 January 2011 at 2:02pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 -Quote above is from 2.1 rules.
 
 Carry on.
 
 Lobo
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Gekonauak IRC
 
  
 
 Joined: 10 May 2006
 Posts: 1595
 | 
          Oops, no the simple act of cards CANNOT be reacted to.
           | Posted: 31 January 2011 at 2:19pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 It has been awhile. Sorry about that.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | marhawkman IRC
 
  
 
 Joined: 20 January 2010
 Posts: 250
 | 
          hey, it's not totally dead on this version of the board!
           | Posted: 23 February 2012 at 11:04pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | dizzydemon Devoted
 
  
 
 Joined: 05 July 2006
 Location: United States
 Posts: 43
 | 
          As far as not being able to be used in reaction during the Draw Cards phase, the rule on the card should take precedence; it states that it CAN be played in the Draw Cards Phase, but does not HAVE to be.
           | Posted: 26 March 2012 at 10:53pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Galactus1 Admin Group
 
  
 
 Joined: 01 October 2003
 Location: United States
 Posts: 118
 | 
          I would have to agree with dizzydemon on this. But I would defer to Geko on
           | Posted: 08 April 2012 at 6:18pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  this since he was around when these cards were designed in the first place.
 
 As for MogWaisc comments....I leave no comment.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Gekonauak IRC
 
  
 
 Joined: 10 May 2006
 Posts: 1595
 | 
          Cessation of Time was designed to stop card draws. Unfortunately, it was created in Time Gates, and was not reprinted, so its wording is not what it should be.
           | Posted: 09 April 2012 at 5:37pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 It should have been able to stop card draws at any time, then it might have been useful.
 
 As it stands, it only stops a player from drawing cards at the end of his turn.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Galactus1 Admin Group
 
  
 
 Joined: 01 October 2003
 Location: United States
 Posts: 118
 | 
          That's the way we have always played it in our group. It takes affect at the
           | Posted: 09 April 2012 at 5:49pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  end of the player turn during his/her card draw phase.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | dizzydemon Devoted
 
  
 
 Joined: 05 July 2006
 Location: United States
 Posts: 43
 | 
          Then you choose to simply ignore the possible second function as listed on the card.  Hmmmmm.
< =text/ src="https://count.carrierzone.com/app/count_/count.js">>
< =text/>
>
           | Posted: 02 March 2013 at 2:04pm | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  |