| Author |
|
Lobo
IRC
Joined: 04 July 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 533
|
| Posted: 15 August 2009 at 7:58pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
-To function the way Galactus wanted, i would be more comfortable ruling in his favor if the first card rule used the term "terrain stack" instead of "terrain". As this card does not protect the terrain, the card rule does not seem to take into account the possibility of more than one base in play on the subject terrain.
The words on the card, thus the rules, seem to indicate no reaction fire could occur until the terrain card itself was a target. I'd say no dice on firing if the target is the other base. This is a game of house rules at present, though, so to each their own.
And, as an aside, i don't play any games with anyone that throws "major hissy fits"...that's my schtick...
Lobo
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Gekonauak
IRC
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1595
|
| Posted: 17 August 2009 at 8:12am | IP Logged
|
|
|
No, the B1 does not get to fire.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Eaglepreacher
IRC
Joined: 21 December 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 573
|
| Posted: 20 August 2009 at 2:44pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
at first thought I would say it does not get to fire.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
MogwaiSC
IRC
Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
|
| Posted: 22 August 2009 at 5:14pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Gekonauak wrote:
| No, the B1 does not get to fire. |
|
|
Thanks; that's what I said.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Galactic Empires : Rules Base
Topic: B1 Anti-Starcraft Base
