Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Rules Base
 Galactic Empires : Rules Base
Subject Topic: R/O8 Cessation of Time" Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
dizzydemon
Devoted
Devoted


Joined: 05 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 43
Posted: 05 September 2010 at 3:48pm | IP Logged Quote dizzydemon

Simple Question:  The R/O8 Cessation of Time card states the following:

-When played during an opponent's Draw Cards Phase that phase is ended

-Prevents any and all card draws.

-Placed at the bottom of the discard pile after use.

My question:  Can this card ONLY by played during the Draw Cards Phase?

Back to Top View dizzydemon's Profile Search for other posts by dizzydemon
 
Lobo
IRC
IRC


Joined: 04 July 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 533
Posted: 05 September 2010 at 7:21pm | IP Logged Quote Lobo

-This is another poorly worded card. There are quite a few in the sets. Actually, i take that back. I don't have a problem with the wording so much as the structure of these card rules. When you read the FAQ and the rules, some card rule ordering matters when other times it doesn't. That lack of consistency is troublesome.

There may well be a meaning to making sure you don't draw cards AND you end the draw cards phase. There may be cards that take advantage of said phase, but i'm drunk and can't think of them right now.

Presumably, it was meant to read something that meant prevents all card draws for the entirety of that player turn only, from the point of reaction to the end of that player turn.

If it was meant to *only* be played during the Draw Cards phase, it should say that. Otherwise, unless it would severely disadvantage or ruin the group, i would say it can be played any time a reaction can be played, and the negation of card draws lasts for that player turn only.

As anything, though, feel free to house rule away.

Lobo, going back to cleaning up the kitchen
Back to Top View Lobo's Profile Search for other posts by Lobo
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 09 September 2010 at 10:06am | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

Yeah, I think Lobo's right here.  it's not entirely clear from the wording.
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 12 September 2010 at 5:39pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

It's poorly worded, yes, but still should be fairly obvious. You play it
during your opponent's draw phase and they can't draw cards and
their turn is over.
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
Matchbox
Adept
Adept


Joined: 27 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 118
Posted: 12 September 2010 at 7:07pm | IP Logged Quote Matchbox

this card works good, especially when some has a cyber mage and an alliance treaty(?) out there.
Back to Top View Matchbox's Profile Search for other posts by Matchbox Visit Matchbox's Homepage
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 13 September 2010 at 4:27pm | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

MogwaiSC wrote:
It's poorly worded, yes, but still should be fairly obvious. You play it during your opponent's draw phase and they can't draw cards and their turn is over.
turn or draw phase?
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 13 September 2010 at 9:01pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

Draw phase is the last part of the turn, so both.

If you were to play outside of their draw phase, as it is worded, it
would prevent them from drawing cards, but there really isn't
anything else to do during draw phase, so it's pretty much moot.

However, I suppose (again with the wording as it is) you could play
it during Allocation phase to thwart someone buying cards with a
Research Developer, as it does say "prevents any and all card
draws". Logically, that would mean it would stop their draws
during draw phase as well in that case.

Perhaps more powerful of a card than we had originally thought...

How do I come up with this stuff? :-o

Edited by MogwaiSC on 13 September 2010 at 9:06pm
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 14 September 2010 at 8:01am | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

MogwaiSC wrote:
How do I come up with this stuff? :-o
Years of practice?
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 14 September 2010 at 4:47pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

Maybe just natural deviousness. :D
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 15 September 2010 at 8:51am | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

Well it's a good reason to make it a card you can't stock many of.  Maybe it should have been an o10 though...
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 17 September 2010 at 3:40am | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

It's all so subjective... a lot of it depends on what the game context
is too... my research developer example above is a case in point. In
that situation you have very powerful card, but it does only work
once, though it's like a discard equivalency, it goes to the bottom of
the discard pile, so there are ways to recover it for reuse. :-o In
other situations, it might not be such a powerful card.
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 17 September 2010 at 11:23am | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

Even if all you do is prevent your opponent from drawing at end of turn it hurts a lot.  At least if they draw the maximum of cards they're allowed.
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 17 September 2010 at 8:29pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

Upon further reflection, it can be pretty nasty if you were to use
something like a temporal engineer and a cloning device. You could
pull it back from the discard pile and completely shut down an
opponent's draws for as long as you can keep the temporal engineer
alive. That would be pretty devastating, even if you could only pull it
off for a few turns.
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
Gekonauak
IRC
IRC


Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1595
Posted: 21 September 2010 at 11:03am | IP Logged Quote Gekonauak

no, this poorly worded card is *ONLY* played during an opponent's draw cards phase.

There is probably errata somewhere in the GFs.

Edited by Gekonauak on 21 September 2010 at 11:03am
Back to Top View Gekonauak's Profile Search for other posts by Gekonauak
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 21 September 2010 at 11:37am | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

Even then it's nasty....  >_<
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
dizzydemon
Devoted
Devoted


Joined: 05 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 43
Posted: 21 September 2010 at 5:55pm | IP Logged Quote dizzydemon

I must admit that I am a bit surprised by the responses.  I guess the guys that felt all rules printed on a card (card function as indicated by a hypen- then the rule.  For example, a C9 Marauder says that it can do two of the following three functions (all of which show a hyphen and then the possible card function.)  If you are saying the card in question (R/O8 Cessation of Time) HAS to use the first card function on its card:   "WHEN played in an opponent's Draw Card Phase is ended."  - then I agree it is VERY poorly worded and should have read: "MUST be played during the opponent's Draw Card Phase". Instead, it says WHEN and then gives a totally different function, if the card owner chooses, of ending ANY and ALL card draws when played.  If this function is used, (it IS a reaction card remember), then any card draws an opponent was about to make come to end.
Back to Top View dizzydemon's Profile Search for other posts by dizzydemon
 
Gekonauak
IRC
IRC


Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1595
Posted: 28 September 2010 at 12:22pm | IP Logged Quote Gekonauak

Looking through all of the published FAQ (in print), I cannot find anything on this card.

I know how the card was played, and how the card would be ruled if it was questioned during an official tournament.

But, I can see a fair arguement if you are going by the "-" being a rule. Played in reaction the card has to perform a function, and the player should be able to choose the second function.

It just was never played that way.
Back to Top View Gekonauak's Profile Search for other posts by Gekonauak
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 28 September 2010 at 12:34pm | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

Ah, definately needs a ruling. ;)
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 29 September 2010 at 1:41am | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

dizzydemon wrote:
I must admit that I am a bit surprised by the responses.  I guess the guys that
felt all rules printed on a card (card function as indicated by a hypen- then the rule.  For example, a
C9 Marauder says that it can do two of the following three functions (all of which show a hyphen and
then the possible card function.)  If you are saying the card in question (R/O8 Cessation of Time) HAS
to use the first card function on its card:   "WHEN played in an opponent's Draw Card Phase is ended." 
- then I agree it is VERY poorly worded and should have read: "MUST be played during the opponent's
Draw Card Phase". Instead, it says WHEN and then gives a totally different function, if the card owner
chooses, of ending ANY and ALL card draws when played.  If this function is used, (it IS a reaction
card remember), then any card draws an opponent was about to make come to end.


This is how our group has played it, that anything with a hyphen in front of it is considered a card
ability and that anything without is flavor text.

Given the exact wording on the card, I agree it should be interpreted as being playable at any time
during a turn, especially given there is no set convention that the first "ability" given on a card has to
be used first. If it is to be played only during your opponents draw phase, the wording should be
appropriate to that.

I guess this is another one that needs to go under the House Rules category...

Of course, if this comes up the next time Galactus and I play GE, I'll bet a months pay it turns into a
full blown argument! :-o :-D
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 29 September 2010 at 12:30pm | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

that sounds entertaining. :)
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 29 September 2010 at 4:40pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

marhawkman wrote:
that sounds entertaining. :)


In retrospect, it can be... Although when it's actually happening it
seems sometimes like we have to restrain ourselves from looking for
heavy things to throw... :D
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
Gekonauak
IRC
IRC


Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1595
Posted: 04 October 2010 at 10:39am | IP Logged Quote Gekonauak

Well, feel free to use this post as a reference during the game.

MogwaiSC is always right and Galactus is always wrong.

There that should solve all disputes, right?!? :)
Back to Top View Gekonauak's Profile Search for other posts by Gekonauak
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 04 October 2010 at 1:32pm | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

No, I doubt that. :p
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 06 October 2010 at 4:27pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

Gekonauak wrote:
Well, feel free to use this post as a reference
during the game.

MogwaiSC is always right and Galactus is always wrong.

There that should solve all disputes, right?!? :)


Well, I wouldn't say ALWAYS...

Just NEARLY ALWAYS.

:-)
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 12 October 2010 at 12:51pm | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

Unless Galactus disagrees. :)
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 12 October 2010 at 2:49pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

marhawkman wrote:
Unless Galactus disagrees. :)


Never changes the outcome. :D He can dislike it all he wants; I'm
still right most of the time... :-)

Just read through the T/B vs planetary destruction thread, you'll get a
sense for how he reacts to being wrong. LOL.
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
marhawkman
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: 13 October 2010 at 11:03am | IP Logged Quote marhawkman

Delete the post to hide the evidence?
Back to Top View marhawkman's Profile Search for other posts by marhawkman
 
MogwaiSC
IRC
IRC


Joined: 20 January 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 903
Posted: 13 October 2010 at 8:44pm | IP Logged Quote MogwaiSC

marhawkman wrote:
Delete the post to hide the evidence?


Something like that, yep.
Back to Top View MogwaiSC's Profile Search for other posts by MogwaiSC
 
dizzydemon
Devoted
Devoted


Joined: 05 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 43
Posted: 01 January 2011 at 2:35am | IP Logged Quote dizzydemon

Thanks for the input all.

Dizzy Demon

Back to Top View dizzydemon's Profile Search for other posts by dizzydemon
 
Tarquon
Exalted
Exalted


Joined: 02 January 2007
Posts: 197
Posted: 27 January 2011 at 10:56am | IP Logged Quote Tarquon

Good luck finding something to react to in the draw cards phase.
Back to Top View Tarquon's Profile Search for other posts by Tarquon
 

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.6
Copyright ©2001-2003 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.6250 seconds.